3015e vs Xeon E5-2603 v2

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2603 v2
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
1.77
+1.1%

Xeon E5-2603 v2 outperforms 3015e by a minimal 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2603 v2 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19081914
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.32no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Pollock (Zen)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)4 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$240no data
Current price$193 (0.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2603 v2 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache10 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2603 v2 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011FT5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2603 v2 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXDDR4-1600 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2603 v2 and 3015e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2603 v2 and 3015e are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2603 v2 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2603 v2 and 3015e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2603 v2 1.77
+1.1%
3015e 1.75

Xeon E5-2603 v2 outperforms 3015e by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2603 v2 2735
+0.8%
3015e 2714

Xeon E5-2603 v2 outperforms 3015e by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.77 1.75
Recency 1 September 2013 4 August 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 6 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2603 v2 and 3015e.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2603 v2 is a server/workstation processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2603 v2 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2603 v2
Xeon E5-2603 v2
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2603 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2603 v2 or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.