A12-9800E vs Xeon E5-2418L
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2418L outperforms A12-9800E by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1735 | 1741 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.89 | 1.72 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 14 May 2012 (12 years ago) | 27 July 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $105 |
| Current price | $127 | $199 (1.9x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
A12-9800E has 93% better value for money than Xeon E5-2418L.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 10240 KB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 294 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,270 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 1356 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | no data | 1 |
| FreeSync | no data | 1 |
| PowerTune | no data | + |
| TrueAudio | no data | + |
| PowerNow | no data | + |
| PowerGating | no data | + |
| VirusProtect | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
| Enduro | no data | + |
| UVD | no data | + |
| VCE | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon E5-2418L outperforms A12-9800E by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon E5-2418L outperforms A12-9800E by 1% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.27 | 2.24 |
| Recency | 14 May 2012 | 27 July 2017 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2418L is a server/workstation processor while A12-9800E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2418L and A12-9800E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
