EPYC 9254 vs Xeon E5-1686 V3
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 108 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 16.95 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 19.57 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 8 September 2014 (11 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,299 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-1686 V3 and EPYC 9254 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4.15 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 29 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 356 mm2 | 4x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 2,600 million | 26,280 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-1686 V3 and EPYC 9254 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 2011-3 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1686 V3 and EPYC 9254. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-1686 V3 and EPYC 9254 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1686 V3 and EPYC 9254 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1686 V3 and EPYC 9254. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2133 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1686 V3 and EPYC 9254.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 September 2014 | 10 November 2022 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 24 |
| Threads | 24 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 200 Watt |
Xeon E5-1686 V3 has 48.1% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9254, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E5-1686 V3 and AMD EPYC 9254. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
