Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G vs Xeon E5 1680 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5 1680 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
8.95
+56.5%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.72

Xeon E5 1680 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8541125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.90no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency6.058.33
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)30 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0PCIe 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier3437
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,400 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1.5 TB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.95 5.72
Recency 20 June 2016 30 September 2019
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5 1680 v4 has a 56.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5 1680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5 1680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5 1680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Xeon E5 1680 v4
Xeon E5 1680 v4
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 67 votes

Rate Xeon E5 1680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 102 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5 1680 v4 or Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.