i9-14900F vs Xeon E5 1680 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5 1680 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
8.95
Core i9-14900F
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
29.71
+232%

Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon E5 1680 v4 by a whopping 232% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i9-14900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking856142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.9548.58
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency6.0543.26
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-14900F has 2391% better value for money than Xeon E5 1680 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i9-14900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246.24 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i9-14900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i9-14900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i9-14900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i9-14900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i9-14900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TB192 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i9-14900F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.95 29.71
Recency 20 June 2016 8 January 2024
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

i9-14900F has a 232% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-14900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5 1680 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5 1680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5 1680 v4 and Core i9-14900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Xeon E5 1680 v4
Xeon E5 1680 v4
Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 67 votes

Rate Xeon E5 1680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 91 vote

Rate Core i9-14900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5 1680 v4 or Core i9-14900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.