i5-2550K vs Xeon E5-1680 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1680 v3
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
8.24
+217%
Core i5-2550K
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.60

Xeon E5-1680 v3 outperforms Core i5-2550K by a whopping 217% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1680 v3 and Core i5-2550K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9211734
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.65
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.572.59
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$189

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1680 v3 and Core i5-2550K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)6144 KB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm2216 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °C73 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million1160 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1680 v3 and Core i5-2550K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1155,LGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1680 v3 and Core i5-2550K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
FDIno data-
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1680 v3 and Core i5-2550K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection++
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1680 v3 and Core i5-2550K are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1680 v3 and Core i5-2550K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Quick Sync Video-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1680 v3 and Core i5-2550K.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1680 v3 8.24
+217%
i5-2550K 2.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1680 v3 13090
+217%
i5-2550K 4134

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.24 2.60
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-1680 v3 has a 216.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

i5-2550K, on the other hand, has 47.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1680 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-2550K in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1680 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-2550K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1680 v3 and Core i5-2550K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3
Xeon E5-1680 v3
Intel Core i5-2550K
Core i5-2550K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 29 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1680 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 160 votes

Rate Core i5-2550K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1680 v3 or Core i5-2550K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.