Ultra 5 226V vs Xeon E5-1680 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1680 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
8.09
Core Ultra 5 226V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.14
+50.1%

Core Ultra 5 226V outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1680 v2 and Core Ultra 5 226V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking940646
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency5.7866.33
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date10 September 2013 (11 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1680 v2 and Core Ultra 5 226V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/s37 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Die size341 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.65–1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1680 v2 and Core Ultra 5 226V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1680 v2 and Core Ultra 5 226V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1680 v2 and Core Ultra 5 226V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1680 v2 and Core Ultra 5 226V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1680 v2 and Core Ultra 5 226V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 130V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1680 v2 and Core Ultra 5 226V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1680 v2 8.09
Ultra 5 226V 12.14
+50.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1680 v2 12612
Ultra 5 226V 18922
+50%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.09 12.14
Recency 10 September 2013 24 September 2024
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon E5-1680 v2 has 100% more threads.

Ultra 5 226V, on the other hand, has a 50.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 633.3% more advanced lithography process, and 664.7% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 5 226V is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1680 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1680 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 226V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1680 v2 and Core Ultra 5 226V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
Core Ultra 5 226V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 148 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1680 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 226V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1680 v2 or Core Ultra 5 226V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.