Apple M1 Max vs Xeon E5-1660 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1660 v2
2013
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
6.46
Apple M1 Max
2021
10 cores / 10 threads, 2060 Watt
13.90
+115%

Apple M1 Max outperforms Xeon E5-1660 v2 by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1660 v2 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1045526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.92no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiency4.70no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)no data
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,809no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1660 v2 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1210
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2.9 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)28 MB
L3 cache15 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1660 v2 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1660 v2 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1660 v2 and Apple M1 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1660 v2 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1660 v2 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1660 v2 and Apple M1 Max.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1660 v2 6.46
Apple M1 Max 13.90
+115%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1660 v2 10268
Apple M1 Max 22077
+115%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.46 13.90
Recency 1 September 2013 18 October 2021
Physical cores 6 10
Threads 12 10
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 2060 Watt

Xeon E5-1660 v2 has 20% more threads, and 1484.6% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has a 115.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 66.7% more physical cores, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1660 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1660 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1660 v2 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2
Xeon E5-1660 v2
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 55 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1660 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 684 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1660 v2 or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.