Ultra 7 265 vs Xeon E5-1620

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1481not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.63no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.69no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$313no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size294 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,270 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA20111851
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size375 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 20
Threads 8 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 7 265 has 400% more physical cores and 150% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1620 and Core Ultra 7 265. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620
Xeon E5-1620
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 168 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 or Core Ultra 7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.