Xeon L5410 vs E5-1603

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1603
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.24
+80.6%

E5-1603 outperforms L5410 by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon L5410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17432224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.510.24
Market segmentServerServer
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Current price$13.59 $76

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-1603 has 113% better value for money than Xeon L5410.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon L5410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.33 GHz
L3 cache10 MB12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature64 °C57 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.6V - 1.35V0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon L5410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2011LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon L5410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching++
FSB parityno data+
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon L5410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon L5410 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon L5410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066no data
Maximum memory size375 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth31.4 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon L5410.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1603 2.24
+80.6%
Xeon L5410 1.24

E5-1603 outperforms L5410 by 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-1603 3459
+80.1%
Xeon L5410 1921

E5-1603 outperforms L5410 by 80% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.24 1.24
Recency 1 January 2012 1 January 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 50 Watt

The Xeon E5-1603 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5410 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon L5410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1603
Xeon E5-1603
Intel Xeon L5410
Xeon L5410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 18 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 64 votes

Rate Xeon L5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1603 or Xeon L5410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.