Xeon E5-2637 vs E5-1603

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1603
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.18
+16.6%
Xeon E5-2637
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.87

Xeon E5-1603 outperforms Xeon E5-2637 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E5-2637 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18521990
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.592.21
Architecture codenameno dataSandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E5-2637 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache10 MB5120 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data294 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °C70 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.6V - 1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E5-2637 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E5-2637. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+-
Demand Based Switching++

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E5-2637 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E5-2637 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E5-2637. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR3
Maximum memory size375 GB384 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth31.4 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E5-2637.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1603 2.18
+16.6%
Xeon E5-2637 1.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1603 3467
+16.4%
Xeon E5-2637 2978

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.18 1.87
Recency 1 January 2012 6 March 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon E5-1603 has a 16.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

Xeon E5-2637, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1603 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2637 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E5-2637, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1603
Xeon E5-1603
Intel Xeon E5-2637
Xeon E5-2637

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2637 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1603 or Xeon E5-2637, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.