EPYC 4344P vs Xeon E5-1603 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1603 v3
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 140 Watt
2.79
EPYC 4344P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
21.53
+672%

EPYC 4344P outperforms Xeon E5-1603 v3 by a whopping 672% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1603 v3 and EPYC 4344P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1689251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.16
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.8931.35
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1603 v3 and EPYC 4344P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm
Die size356 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.65–1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1603 v3 and EPYC 4344P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011-3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1603 v3 and EPYC 4344P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1603 v3 and EPYC 4344P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1603 v3 and EPYC 4344P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1603 v3 and EPYC 4344P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1603 v3 and EPYC 4344P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4028

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1603 v3 2.79
EPYC 4344P 21.53
+672%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1603 v3 4432
EPYC 4344P 34198
+672%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.79 21.53
Recency 8 September 2014 21 May 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 4344P has a 671.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 340% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 4344P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1603 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1603 v3 and EPYC 4344P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3
Xeon E5-1603 v3
AMD EPYC 4344P
EPYC 4344P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 44 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1603 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4344P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1603 v3 or EPYC 4344P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.