i3-2355M vs Xeon E5-1428L V2
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1685 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i3 |
| Power efficiency | 6.34 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 9 January 2014 (11 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-1428L V2 and Core i3-2355M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 13 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 15 MB (shared) | 3 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | 149 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 80 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,860 million | 624 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-1428L V2 and Core i3-2355M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 1356 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1428L V2 and Core i3-2355M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-1428L V2 and Core i3-2355M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1428L V2 and Core i3-2355M are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1428L V2 and Core i3-2355M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1428L V2 and Core i3-2355M.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 17 Watt |
Xeon E5-1428L V2 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.
i3-2355M, on the other hand, has 252.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E5-1428L V2 and Intel Core i3-2355M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-1428L V2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-2355M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
