Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon E3110 vs E3120
Aggregated performance score
Xeon E3120
2008
0.92
+13.6%
E3120 outperforms E3110 by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Xeon E3120 and Xeon E3110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2394 | 2469 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Release date | 1 July 2008 (15 years old) | 1 January 2008 (16 years old) |
| Current price | $160 | $33 |
Value for money
Xeon E3110 has 17% better value for money than Xeon E3120.
Technical specs
Xeon E3120 and Xeon E3110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Base clock speed | 3.16 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3120 and Xeon E3110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3120 and Xeon E3110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| FSB parity | - | - |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon E3120 and Xeon E3110 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3120 and Xeon E3110 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
E3120 outperforms E3110 by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
E3120 outperforms E3110 by 13% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 0.92 | 0.81 |
| Recency | 1 July 2008 | 1 January 2008 |
The Xeon E3120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3110 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3120 and Xeon E3110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
