Pentium E6700 vs Xeon E3110
Aggregated performance score
Xeon E3110 outperforms Pentium E6700 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Xeon E3110 and Pentium E6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2478 | 2520 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 0.07 | 4.16 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | no data | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 30 May 2010 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $80 |
| Current price | $63 | $42 (0.5x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Pentium E6700 has 5843% better value for money than Xeon E3110.
Technical specs
Xeon E3110 and Pentium E6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 82 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 228 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3110 and Pentium E6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3110 and Pentium E6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon E3110 and Pentium E6700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3110 and Pentium E6700 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3110 and Pentium E6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3110 and Pentium E6700.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon E3110 outperforms Pentium E6700 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon E3110 outperforms Pentium E6700 by 6% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon E3110 outperforms Pentium E6700 by 6% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon E3110 outperforms Pentium E6700 by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 0.80 | 0.76 |
| Recency | 1 January 2008 | 30 May 2010 |
We couldn't decide between Xeon E3110 and Pentium E6700. The differences in performance seem too small.
Be aware that Xeon E3110 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium E6700 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3110 and Pentium E6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
