EPYC 7773X vs Xeon E3110
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7773X outperforms Xeon E3110 by a whopping 7294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2513 | 16 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.07 | 17.21 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | no data | Milan-X (2022) |
| Release date | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Current price | $55 | $1950 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 7773X has 24486% better value for money than Xeon E3110.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 768 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | LGA775 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
EPYC 7773X outperforms Xeon E3110 by 7294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
EPYC 7773X outperforms Xeon E3110 by 7266% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
EPYC 7773X outperforms Xeon E3110 by 286% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
EPYC 7773X outperforms Xeon E3110 by 2188% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.80 | 59.15 |
| Recency | 1 January 2008 | 22 March 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 280 Watt |
The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3110 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
