EPYC 9575F vs Xeon E3-1285 v4
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1231 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | 4.90 | no data |
Architecture codename | Broadwell-DT (2015) | Turin (2024) |
Release date | 2 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $11,791 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 128 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 5 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 160 mm2 | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 66,520 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | FCLGA1150 | SP5 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
eDRAM | 128 MB | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Idle States | + | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9575F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.8 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel Iris Pro P6300 | N/A |
Max video memory | 32 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | no data |
Execution Units | 48 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9575F integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9575F.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 2 June 2015 | 10 October 2024 |
Physical cores | 4 | 64 |
Threads | 8 | 128 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 400 Watt |
Xeon E3-1285 v4 has 321.1% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.