Xeon E3-1265L v4 vs E3-1285 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1285 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 84 Watt
4.39
+0.2%
Xeon E3-1265L v4
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
4.38

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1265L v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13511354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.9511.84
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Broadwell-DT (2015)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)2 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1265L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2182 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1265L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1265L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAMno data128 MB
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
FDI++
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1265L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1265L v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1265L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s29.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4600Intel Iris Pro P6300
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz1.05 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1265L v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1265L v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1285 v3 4.39
+0.2%
Xeon E3-1265L v4 4.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1285 v3 6974
+0.3%
Xeon E3-1265L v4 6954

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.39 4.38
Recency 2 June 2013 2 June 2015
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E3-1285 v3 has a 0.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon E3-1265L v4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1265L v4.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1265L v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1285 v3
Xeon E3-1285 v3
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v4
Xeon E3-1265L v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1285 v3 or Xeon E3-1265L v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.