Celeron U3600 vs Xeon E3-1280 v6

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1280 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 72 Watt
5.69
+1481%
Celeron U3600
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.36

Xeon E3-1280 v6 outperforms Celeron U3600 by a whopping 1481% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11453048
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.01no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency7.481.89
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date28 March 2017 (7 years ago)11 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$612no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.9 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate8 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier399
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache8 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)72 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866DDR3-800
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s12.799 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1280 v6 5.69
+1481%
Celeron U3600 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1280 v6 9032
+1460%
Celeron U3600 579

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.69 0.36
Recency 28 March 2017 11 January 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 72 Watt 18 Watt

Xeon E3-1280 v6 has a 1480.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron U3600, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1280 v6 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron U3600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1280 v6 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron U3600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1280 v6 and Celeron U3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1280 v6
Xeon E3-1280 v6
Intel Celeron U3600
Celeron U3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1280 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1280 v6 or Celeron U3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.