Xeon X5670 vs E3-1280 v5
Aggregated performance score
E3-1280 v5 outperforms X5670 by 38% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Xeon X5670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1062 | 1337 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 4.63 | 1.06 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | Intel Xeon E3 | Xeon (Desktop) |
Architecture codename | Skylake-S (2015) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
Release date | 19 October 2015 (8 years old) | 16 March 2010 (14 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $612 | $67 |
Current price | $160 (0.3x MSRP) | $80 (1.2x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon E3-1280 v5 has 337% better value for money than Xeon X5670.
Technical specs
Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Xeon X5670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.33 GHz |
Bus support | no data | 6400 MHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 160 mm2 | 239 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 1,170 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Xeon X5670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Xeon X5670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | no data |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 1.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | + | no data |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
PAE | no data | 40 Bit |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Xeon X5670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | no data |
SGX | Yes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Xeon X5670 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Xeon X5670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 288 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 3 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 32 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Xeon X5670 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | N/A | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | N/A | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | N/A | no data |
Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Xeon X5670 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | N/A | no data |
OpenGL | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Xeon X5670.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
E3-1280 v5 outperforms X5670 by 38% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
E3-1280 v5 outperforms X5670 by 38% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
E3-1280 v5 outperforms X5670 by 169% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
E3-1280 v5 outperforms X5670 by 96% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
E3-1280 v5 outperforms X5670 by 46% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
E3-1280 v5 outperforms X5670 by 18% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 5.49 | 3.98 |
Recency | 19 October 2015 | 16 March 2010 |
Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
Threads | 8 | 12 |
Cost | $612 | $67 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 95 Watt |
The Xeon E3-1280 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5670 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Xeon X5670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.