Ultra 7 268V vs Xeon E3-1280 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1280 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 69 Watt
4.13
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
15.09
+265%

Core Ultra 7 268V outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v2 by a whopping 265% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1280 v2 and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1385462
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.01no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency5.6684.00
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$645no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1280 v2 and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s37 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1280 v2 and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1280 v2 and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1280 v2 and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1280 v2 and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1280 v2 and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32.77 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1280 v2 and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.13 15.09
Recency 14 May 2012 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 268V has a 265.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores, a 633.3% more advanced lithography process, and 305.9% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 268V is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1280 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1280 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 268V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1280 v2 and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1280 v2
Xeon E3-1280 v2
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 179 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1280 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 268V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1280 v2 or Core Ultra 7 268V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.