Intel Xeon X5687 vs E3-1275

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Xeon E3-1275
3.58
+3.5%

E3-1275 outperforms X5687 by 3% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon X5687 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14081430
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.141.41
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date3 April 2011 (12 years old)14 February 2011 (13 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$450$121
Current price$259 (0.6x MSRP)$195 (1.6x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5687 has 24% better value for money than Xeon E3-1275.

Technical specs

Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon X5687 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.86 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C80 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon X5687 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA1155FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon X5687. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAEno data40 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon X5687 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon X5687 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon X5687. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB288 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P3000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon X5687 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon X5687.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1275 3.58
+3.5%
Xeon X5687 3.46

E3-1275 outperforms X5687 by 3% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1275 5503
+3.7%
Xeon X5687 5309

E3-1275 outperforms X5687 by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.58 3.46
Recency 3 April 2011 14 February 2011
Cost $450 $121
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon X5687. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon X5687, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1275
Xeon E3-1275
Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 17 votes

Rate Intel Xeon E3-1275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 52 votes

Rate Intel Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1275 or Xeon X5687, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.