Xeon E3-1240 vs E3-1275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1275
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.47
+2.1%
Xeon E3-1240
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
3.40

Xeon E3-1275 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon E3-1240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15351554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.992.04
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.464.02
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)3 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450$209

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1240 has 106% better value for money than Xeon E3-1275.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon E3-1240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2216 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C69 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million1,160 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon E3-1240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155LGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon E3-1240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching++
FDI+-
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon E3-1240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon E3-1240 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon E3-1240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHzno data
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon E3-1240 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon E3-1240.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1275 3.47
+2.1%
Xeon E3-1240 3.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1275 5516
+2.1%
Xeon E3-1240 5403

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.47 3.40
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon E3-1275 has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon E3-1240, on the other hand, has 18.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon E3-1240.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1275 and Xeon E3-1240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1275
Xeon E3-1275
Intel Xeon E3-1240
Xeon E3-1240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 22 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 171 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1275 or Xeon E3-1240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.