FX-8350 vs Xeon E3-1275 v5

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1275 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.29
+41.4%
FX-8350
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.74

Xeon E3-1275 v5 outperforms FX-8350 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11901486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.300.89
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3AMD FX-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency6.262.83
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$350$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1275 v5 has 271% better value for money than FX-8350.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size122 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors1,750 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics P530On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1275 v5 5.29
+41.4%
FX-8350 3.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1275 v5 8395
+41.4%
FX-8350 5936

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1275 v5 1348
+177%
FX-8350 487

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1275 v5 4380
+121%
FX-8350 1983

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.29 3.74
Recency 19 October 2015 23 October 2012
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E3-1275 v5 has a 41.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 56.3% lower power consumption.

FX-8350, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Xeon E3-1275 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1275 v5 is a server/workstation processor while FX-8350 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1275 v5 and FX-8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
Xeon E3-1275 v5
AMD FX-8350
FX-8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1275 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3740 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1275 v5 or FX-8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.