FX-6300 vs Xeon E3-1275 v2

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E3-1275 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads
4.29
+60.7%

Xeon E3-1275 v2 outperforms FX-6300 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1275 v2 and FX-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12721603
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.081.32
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$808no data
Current price$418 (0.5x MSRP)$67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-6300 has 22% better value for money than Xeon E3-1275 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1275 v2 and FX-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads86
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1275 v2 and FX-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1275 v2 and FX-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1275 v2 and FX-6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1275 v2 and FX-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1275 v2 and FX-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size32.77 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4000On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1275 v2 and FX-6300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1275 v2 and FX-6300.

PCIe version3.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1275 v2 4.29
+60.7%
FX-6300 2.67

Xeon E3-1275 v2 outperforms FX-6300 by 61% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1275 v2 6630
+60.3%
FX-6300 4137

Xeon E3-1275 v2 outperforms FX-6300 by 60% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1275 v2 643
+39.2%
FX-6300 462

Xeon E3-1275 v2 outperforms FX-6300 by 39% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1275 v2 2270
+56.4%
FX-6300 1451

Xeon E3-1275 v2 outperforms FX-6300 by 56% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.29 2.67
Recency 14 May 2012 23 October 2012
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 6
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 95 Watt

The Xeon E3-1275 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1275 v2 is a server/workstation processor while FX-6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1275 v2 and FX-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
Xeon E3-1275 v2
AMD FX-6300
FX-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 191 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1275 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3749 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1275 v2 or FX-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.