Phenom II X4 X920 BE vs Xeon E3-1270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1270
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
3.04
+134%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.30

Xeon E3-1270 outperforms Phenom II X4 X920 BE by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17562394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.38no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno data4x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency1.611.23
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date3 April 2011 (14 years ago)12 May 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1270 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1270 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA1155S1
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXHyperTransport 3.0, Enhanced Virus Protection, AMD64, SSE4A, unlocked multiplier
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1270 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.04 1.30
Recency 3 April 2011 12 May 2010
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon E3-1270 has a 133.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Phenom II X4 X920 BE, on the other hand, has 77.8% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon E3-1270 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1270 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X4 X920 BE is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1270
Xeon E3-1270
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE
Phenom II X4 X920 BE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1078 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 X920 BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E3-1270 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.