i3-3240 vs Xeon E3-1270 v6

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1270 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 72 Watt
5.62
+285%
Core i3-3240
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.46

Xeon E3-1270 v6 outperforms Core i3-3240 by a whopping 285% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11382164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.782.62
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Power efficiency7.392.51
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date28 March 2017 (7 years ago)3 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$328$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1270 v6 has 121% better value for money than i3-3240.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data94 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)72 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+-
MPX+-
Identity Protection-+
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 2500
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1270 v6 5.62
+285%
i3-3240 1.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1270 v6 8932
+285%
i3-3240 2322

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1270 v6 1417
+159%
i3-3240 547

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1270 v6 4505
+303%
i3-3240 1119

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.62 1.46
Recency 28 March 2017 3 September 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 72 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon E3-1270 v6 has a 284.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

i3-3240, on the other hand, has 30.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1270 v6 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3240 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1270 v6 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-3240 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1270 v6 and Core i3-3240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6
Xeon E3-1270 v6
Intel Core i3-3240
Core i3-3240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 45 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1219 votes

Rate Core i3-3240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1270 v6 or Core i3-3240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.