FX-9830P vs Xeon E3-1270 v5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1270 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.40
+152%

Xeon E3-1270 v5 outperforms FX-9830P by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1270 v5 and FX-9830P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11031789
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.52no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E3AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$339no data
Current price$301 (0.9x MSRP)$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1270 v5 and FX-9830P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size122 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1270 v5 and FX-9830P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1151no data
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt25-45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and FX-9830P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1270 v5 and FX-9830P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and FX-9830P are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and FX-9830P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and FX-9830P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and FX-9830P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1270 v5 and FX-9830P.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1270 v5 5.40
+152%
FX-9830P 2.14

Xeon E3-1270 v5 outperforms FX-9830P by 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1270 v5 8351
+153%
FX-9830P 3307

Xeon E3-1270 v5 outperforms FX-9830P by 153% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1270 v5 1324
+117%
FX-9830P 609

Xeon E3-1270 v5 outperforms FX-9830P by 117% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1270 v5 4339
+184%
FX-9830P 1526

Xeon E3-1270 v5 outperforms FX-9830P by 184% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.40 2.14
Recency 19 October 2015 1 June 2016
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 25 Watt

The Xeon E3-1270 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9830P in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1270 v5 is a server/workstation processor while FX-9830P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1270 v5 and FX-9830P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
Xeon E3-1270 v5
AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 100 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 109 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1270 v5 or FX-9830P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.