Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U vs Xeon E3-1268L v5

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1268L v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
3.99
+10.5%
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.61

Xeon E3-1268L v5 outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14301509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.72no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E3AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency10.8022.79
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$377no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2420
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors1,750 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket1151FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics P530AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1268L v5 3.99
+10.5%
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 3.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1268L v5 6334
+10.4%
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 5737

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.99 3.61
Integrated graphics card 2.79 3.04
Recency 19 October 2015 26 October 2017
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E3-1268L v5 has a 10.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, on the other hand, has 9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1268L v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1268L v5 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1268L v5 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1268L v5
Xeon E3-1268L v5
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1268L v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 121 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1268L v5 or Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.