Xeon E5-2630L vs E3-1265L v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1265L v4
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
4.38
+31.1%
Xeon E5-2630L
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
3.34

Xeon E3-1265L v4 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Xeon E5-2630L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13441572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency11.845.27
Architecture codenameBroadwell-DT (2015)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Xeon E5-2630L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s7.2 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)15360 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size182 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Xeon E5-2630L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Xeon E5-2630L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAM128 MBno data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Xeon E5-2630L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Xeon E5-2630L are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Xeon E5-2630L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB384 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/s42.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Iris Pro P6300no data
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Xeon E5-2630L integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Xeon E5-2630L.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1265L v4 4.38
+31.1%
Xeon E5-2630L 3.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1265L v4 6954
+31.1%
Xeon E5-2630L 5305

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.38 3.34
Recency 2 June 2015 6 March 2012
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 60 Watt

Xeon E3-1265L v4 has a 31.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2630L, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Xeon E3-1265L v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2630L in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Xeon E5-2630L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v4
Xeon E3-1265L v4
Intel Xeon E5-2630L
Xeon E5-2630L

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 16 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2630L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1265L v4 or Xeon E5-2630L, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.