EPYC 9645 vs Xeon E3-1265L v4

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9645 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1355not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency11.84no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-DT (2015)Turin (2024)
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,048

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9645 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads8192
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size182 mm2no data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9645 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1150SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9645. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
eDRAM128 MBno data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
FDI+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9645 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9645 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9645. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Iris Pro P6300N/A
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9645 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9645.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2015 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 8 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon E3-1265L v4 has 814.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9645, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9645. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1265L v4 and EPYC 9645, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v4
Xeon E3-1265L v4
AMD EPYC 9645
EPYC 9645

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1265L v4 or EPYC 9645, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.