Core 2 Duo T5870 vs Xeon E3-1265L v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1265L v4
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
3.96
+890%

Xeon E3-1265L v4 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5870 by a whopping 890% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15423187
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency4.780.50
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-DT (2015)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date2 June 2015 (10 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Core 2 Duo T5870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s800 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size182 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.075V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Core 2 Duo T5870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1150no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Core 2 Duo T5870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAM128 MBno data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Core 2 Duo T5870 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Core 2 Duo T5870 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Core 2 Duo T5870. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Iris Pro P6300no data
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Core 2 Duo T5870 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Core 2 Duo T5870.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E3-1265L v4 3.96
+890%
Core 2 Duo T5870 0.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E3-1265L v4 6954
+886%
Samples: 2
Core 2 Duo T5870 705
Samples: 339

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.96 0.40
Recency 2 June 2015 1 October 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm

Xeon E3-1265L v4 has a 890% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon E3-1265L v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1265L v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo T5870 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v4
Xeon E3-1265L v4
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870
Core 2 Duo T5870

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 33 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E3-1265L v4 and Core 2 Duo T5870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.