i7-9700F vs Xeon E3-1265L v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1265L v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.06
Core i7-9700F
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.66
+113%

Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-9700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1434901
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.838.78
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Power efficiency8.2312.15
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$710$323

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-9700F has 958% better value for money than Xeon E3-1265L v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-9700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-9700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-9700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP++
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-9700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-9700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-9700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-9700F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-9700F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1265L v3 4.06
i7-9700F 8.66
+113%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1265L v3 6211
i7-9700F 13246
+113%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1265L v3 1168
i7-9700F 1576
+34.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1265L v3 3563
i7-9700F 6308
+77%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.06 8.66
Recency 2 June 2013 23 April 2019
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E3-1265L v3 has 44.4% lower power consumption.

i7-9700F, on the other hand, has a 113.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-9700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1265L v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1265L v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-9700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-9700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
Xeon E3-1265L v3
Intel Core i7-9700F
Core i7-9700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 135 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 667 votes

Rate Core i7-9700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1265L v3 or Core i7-9700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.