Opteron 6366 HE vs Xeon E3-1265L v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1265L v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
3.24
Opteron 6366 HE
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
3.53
+9%

Opteron 6366 HE outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Opteron 6366 HE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15921521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.96no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.813.93
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Abu Dhabi (2012)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)5 November 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Opteron 6366 HE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2315 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Opteron 6366 HE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketFCLGA1155G34
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Opteron 6366 HE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Opteron 6366 HE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Opteron 6366 HE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Opteron 6366 HE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32.77 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Opteron 6366 HE integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Opteron 6366 HE.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1265L v2 3.24
Opteron 6366 HE 3.53
+9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1265L v2 5148
Opteron 6366 HE 5613
+9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.24 3.53
Recency 14 May 2012 5 November 2012
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon E3-1265L v2 has a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 88.9% lower power consumption.

Opteron 6366 HE, on the other hand, has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Opteron 6366 HE.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Opteron 6366 HE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
Xeon E3-1265L v2
AMD Opteron 6366 HE
Opteron 6366 HE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 42 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Opteron 6366 HE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1265L v2 or Opteron 6366 HE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.