EPYC 9575F vs Xeon E3-1240

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1563not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.23no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.00no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Turin (2024)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209$11,791

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads8128
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size216 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA1155SP5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 and EPYC 9575F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2011 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 8 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 400 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 has 400% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1240 and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240
Xeon E3-1240
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 188 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.