Core i7-10700 vs Xeon E3-1240 v6

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 72 Watt
5.62
Core i7-10700
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.63
+89.1%

i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v6 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1076682
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.6728.25
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date28 March 2017 (7 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$272$340
Current price$377 (1.4x MSRP)$218 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-10700 has 505% better value for money than Xeon E3-1240 v6.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus support8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)72 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPPno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth37.5 GB/s45.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.2 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/A4096 x 2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPN/A4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/A4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/A12
OpenGLN/A4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v6 5.62
i7-10700 10.63
+89.1%

Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v6 by 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1240 v6 8686
i7-10700 16448
+89.4%

Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v6 by 89% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1240 v6 1344
i7-10700 1586
+18%

Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v6 by 18% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1240 v6 4333
i7-10700 7045
+62.6%

Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v6 by 63% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.62 10.63
Recency 28 March 2017 30 April 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Cost $272 $340
Power consumption (TDP) 72 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i7-10700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1240 v6 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v6 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-10700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-10700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v6
Xeon E3-1240 v6
Intel Core i7-10700
Core i7-10700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 12 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1115 votes

Rate Core i7-10700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v6 or Core i7-10700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.