Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E3-1240 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.43
Ryzen 3 7335U
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
7.84
+77%

Ryzen 3 7335U outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Ryzen 3 7335U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1331956
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.68no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency5.2126.36
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Rembrandt-R (2023)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$300no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Ryzen 3 7335U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm6 nm
Die size160 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Ryzen 3 7335U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FP7
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Ryzen 3 7335U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Ryzen 3 7335U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Ryzen 3 7335U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Ryzen 3 7335U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 660M ( - 1800 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Ryzen 3 7335U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v3 4.43
Ryzen 3 7335U 7.84
+77%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v3 7040
Ryzen 3 7335U 12456
+76.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.43 7.84
Recency 2 June 2013 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 3 7335U has a 77% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 266.7% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 7335U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1240 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 7335U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Ryzen 3 7335U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
Xeon E3-1240 v3
AMD Ryzen 3 7335U
Ryzen 3 7335U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 357 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7335U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v3 or Ryzen 3 7335U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.