i3-9100E vs Xeon E3-1240 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.56
+2.7%

Xeon E3-1240 v3 outperforms i3-9100E by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i3-9100E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12841315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.40no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$300no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i3-9100E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2126 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i3-9100E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA11501151
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i3-9100E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i3-9100E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i3-9100E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i3-9100E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i3-9100E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v3 4.56
+2.7%
i3-9100E 4.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v3 7053
+2.7%
i3-9100E 6868

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.56 4.44
Recency 2 June 2013 1 September 2018
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v3 has a 2.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

i3-9100E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i3-9100E.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-9100E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i3-9100E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Intel Core i3-9100E
Core i3-9100E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 345 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Core i3-9100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v3 or Core i3-9100E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.