Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon E3-1240 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 69 Watt
4.00
Ryzen 5 2400GE
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
4.71
+17.8%

Ryzen 5 2400GE outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Ryzen 5 2400GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14131265
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.99no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency5.4912.74
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$304no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Ryzen 5 2400GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2210 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Ryzen 5 2400GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155AM4
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Ryzen 5 2400GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Ryzen 5 2400GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Ryzen 5 2400GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Ryzen 5 2400GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size32.77 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Ryzen 5 2400GE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 4.00
Ryzen 5 2400GE 4.71
+17.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 6360
Ryzen 5 2400GE 7477
+17.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.00 4.71
Recency 14 May 2012 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 2400GE has a 17.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 97.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 2400GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1240 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 2400GE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Ryzen 5 2400GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
Xeon E3-1240 v2
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
Ryzen 5 2400GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 986 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 85 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2400GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v2 or Ryzen 5 2400GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.