Core i5-7442EQ vs Xeon E3-1240 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 69 Watt
4.11
+31.3%

Xeon E3-1240 v2 outperforms Core i5-7442EQ by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i5-7442EQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13301538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.890.13
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$304$250
Current price$108 (0.4x MSRP)$2460 (9.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 has 2892% better value for money than i5-7442EQ.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i5-7442EQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus supportno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i5-7442EQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155no data
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i5-7442EQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i5-7442EQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i5-7442EQ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i5-7442EQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size32.77 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i5-7442EQ.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 4.11
+31.3%
i5-7442EQ 3.13

Xeon E3-1240 v2 outperforms Core i5-7442EQ by 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1240 v2 6352
+31.4%
i5-7442EQ 4834

Xeon E3-1240 v2 outperforms Core i5-7442EQ by 31% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.11 3.13
Recency 14 May 2012 3 January 2017
Threads 8 4
Cost $304 $250
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 25 Watt

The Xeon E3-1240 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-7442EQ in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-7442EQ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i5-7442EQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Intel Core i5-7442EQ
Core i5-7442EQ

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 899 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i5-7442EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v2 or Core i5-7442EQ, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.