Atom C3808 vs Xeon E3-1240 v2

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom C3808 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1421not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.14no data
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency5.46no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$304$369

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom C3808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64 KB (per core)672 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)12 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data86 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom C3808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom C3808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom C3808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom C3808 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom C3808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 2133
Maximum memory size32.77 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom C3808.

PCIe version3.03
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2012 15 August 2017
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 25 Watt

Atom C3808 has an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 176% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom C3808. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom C3808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Intel Atom C3808
Atom C3808

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 996 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v2 or Atom C3808, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.