EPYC 7502P vs Xeon E3-1235

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1235
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.27
EPYC 7502P
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
32.57
+896%

EPYC 7502P outperforms Xeon E3-1235 by a whopping 896% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC 7502P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1517110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.0715.71
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$287$2,300
Current price$125 (0.4x MSRP)$1681 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7502P has 659% better value for money than Xeon E3-1235.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC 7502P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.35 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size216 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC 7502P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA1155TR4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC 7502P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC 7502P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC 7502P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC 7502P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P3000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC 7502P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC 7502P.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1235 3.27
EPYC 7502P 32.57
+896%

EPYC 7502P outperforms Xeon E3-1235 by 896% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1235 5053
EPYC 7502P 50382
+897%

EPYC 7502P outperforms Xeon E3-1235 by 897% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1235 588
EPYC 7502P 1021
+73.6%

EPYC 7502P outperforms Xeon E3-1235 by 74% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1235 1995
EPYC 7502P 8660
+334%

EPYC 7502P outperforms Xeon E3-1235 by 334% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.27 32.57
Recency 3 April 2011 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Cost $287 $2300
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 180 Watt

The EPYC 7502P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1235 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC 7502P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1235
Xeon E3-1235
AMD EPYC 7502P
EPYC 7502P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 24 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 26 votes

Rate EPYC 7502P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1235 or EPYC 7502P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.