Xeon Gold 6312U vs E3-1231 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1231 v3
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.44
Xeon Gold 6312U
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
26.65
+500%

Xeon Gold 6312U outperforms Xeon E3-1231 v3 by a whopping 500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Xeon Gold 6312U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1332186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.36no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesXeon (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency5.2613.64
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date11 May 2014 (10 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$240no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Xeon Gold 6312U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Xeon Gold 6312U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Xeon Gold 6312U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Xeon Gold 6312U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Xeon Gold 6312U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Xeon Gold 6312U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Xeon Gold 6312U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1231 v3 4.44
Xeon Gold 6312U 26.65
+500%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1231 v3 7053
Xeon Gold 6312U 42329
+500%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.44 26.65
Recency 11 May 2014 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon E3-1231 v3 has 131.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6312U, on the other hand, has a 500.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6312U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1231 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Xeon Gold 6312U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
Xeon Gold 6312U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 246 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1231 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6312U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1231 v3 or Xeon Gold 6312U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.