Atom x5-E3940 vs Xeon E3-1231 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1231 v3
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.57
+263%

Xeon E3-1231 v3 outperforms Atom x5-E3940 by a whopping 263% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Atom x5-E3940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12952283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.21no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesXeon (Desktop)5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date11 May 2014 (10 years ago)30 August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$240no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Atom x5-E3940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Atom x5-E3940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Atom x5-E3940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Atom x5-E3940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Atom x5-E3940 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Atom x5-E3940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Atom x5-E3940.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1231 v3 4.57
+263%
Atom x5-E3940 1.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1231 v3 7045
+263%
Atom x5-E3940 1941

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.57 1.26
Recency 11 May 2014 30 August 2014
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E3-1231 v3 has a 262.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Atom x5-E3940, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1231 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3940 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1231 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x5-E3940 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1231 v3 and Atom x5-E3940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Atom x5-E3940
Atom x5-E3940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 237 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1231 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Atom x5-E3940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1231 v3 or Atom x5-E3940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.