Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs Xeon E3-1230

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1230
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
3.36
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
3.75
+11.6%

Phenom II X6 1100T BE outperforms Xeon E3-1230 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1230 and Phenom II X6 1100T BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15901491
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.92no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.832.74
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Thuban (2010)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)7 December 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$428no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1230 and Phenom II X6 1100T BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads86
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size216 mm2346 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1230 and Phenom II X6 1100T BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155AM3
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1230 and Phenom II X6 1100T BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1230 and Phenom II X6 1100T BE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1230 and Phenom II X6 1100T BE are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1230 and Phenom II X6 1100T BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1230 and Phenom II X6 1100T BE.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1230 3.36
Phenom II X6 1100T BE 3.75
+11.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1230 5137
Phenom II X6 1100T BE 5745
+11.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.36 3.75
Recency 3 April 2011 7 December 2010
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 6
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E3-1230 has an age advantage of 3 months, 33.3% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 56.3% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE, on the other hand, has a 11.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores.

The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1230 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1230 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X6 1100T BE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1230 and Phenom II X6 1100T BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1230
Xeon E3-1230
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 183 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 457 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1100T BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1230 or Phenom II X6 1100T BE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.