EPYC 9654 vs Xeon E3-1230 v6

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E3-1230 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads
5.25

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v6 by 1404% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1230 v6 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10974
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.1210.11
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E3AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Genoa
Release date28 March 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250$11,805
Current price$418 (1.7x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9654 has 145% better value for money than Xeon E3-1230 v6.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1230 v6 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads8192
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1230 v6 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1151SP5
Power consumption (TDP)72 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1230 v6 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1230 v6 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1230 v6 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1230 v6 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth37.5 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1230 v6 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1230 v6 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1230 v6 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1230 v6 5.25
EPYC 9654 78.94
+1404%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v6 by 1404% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1230 v6 8113
EPYC 9654 122091
+1405%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v6 by 1405% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1230 v6 1297
EPYC 9654 1829
+41%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v6 by 41% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1230 v6 4369
EPYC 9654 18566
+325%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v6 by 325% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.25 78.94
Recency 28 March 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 8 192
Cost $250 $11805
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 72 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1230 v6 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1230 v6 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1230 v6
Xeon E3-1230 v6
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 11 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 979 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1230 v6 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.