Xeon X5670 vs E3-1230 v3

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E3-1230 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads
4.45
+11.8%
Xeon X5670
2010
6 cores / 12 threads
3.98

E3-1230 v3 outperforms X5670 by 12% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Xeon X5670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12411337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.501.06
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesXeon (Desktop)Xeon (Desktop)
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date2 June 2013 (10 years old)16 March 2010 (14 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$240$67
Current price$317 (1.3x MSRP)$80 (1.2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 has 42% better value for money than Xeon X5670.

Technical specs

Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Xeon X5670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus supportno data6400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Xeon X5670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Xeon X5670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Xeon X5670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Xeon X5670 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Xeon X5670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB288 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Xeon X5670.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 4.45
+11.8%
Xeon X5670 3.98

E3-1230 v3 outperforms X5670 by 12% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 6811
+11.9%
Xeon X5670 6089

E3-1230 v3 outperforms X5670 by 12% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 1137
+136%
Xeon X5670 481

E3-1230 v3 outperforms X5670 by 136% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 3699
+64.3%
Xeon X5670 2251

E3-1230 v3 outperforms X5670 by 64% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 5506
+48.9%
Xeon X5670 3698

E3-1230 v3 outperforms X5670 by 49% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 21708
+8.8%
Xeon X5670 19954

E3-1230 v3 outperforms X5670 by 9% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 7996
+38%
Xeon X5670 5794

E3-1230 v3 outperforms X5670 by 38% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Xeon E3-1230 v3 8
+4.8%
Xeon X5670 8

E3-1230 v3 outperforms X5670 by 5% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.45 3.98
Recency 2 June 2013 16 March 2010
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Cost $240 $67
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 95 Watt

The Xeon E3-1230 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Xeon X5670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Xeon E3-1230 v3
Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 499 votes

Rate Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 455 votes

Rate Intel Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1230 v3 or Xeon X5670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.