i7-975 vs Xeon E3-1230 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1230 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.29
+95%
Core i7-975
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.20

Xeon E3-1230 v3 outperforms Core i7-975 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core i7-975 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13611835
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.930.10
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesXeon (Desktop)Core i7 (Desktop)
Power efficiency5.071.60
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)2 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$240$476

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 has 2830% better value for money than i7-975.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core i7-975 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s1333 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2263 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data68 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core i7-975 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core i7-975. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core i7-975 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core i7-975 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core i7-975. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB24 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core i7-975.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 4.29
+95%
i7-975 2.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 6818
+95.1%
i7-975 3494

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 1162
+116%
i7-975 539

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 3707
+96.8%
i7-975 1884

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 5506
+34.3%
i7-975 4101

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 21708
+30.6%
i7-975 16628

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 7996
+37%
i7-975 5837

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 8
+31.8%
i7-975 6

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.29 2.20
Recency 2 June 2013 2 June 2009
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon E3-1230 v3 has a 95% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1230 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-975 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1230 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-975 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1230 v3 and Core i7-975, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Xeon E3-1230 v3
Intel Core i7-975
Core i7-975

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 557 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 25 votes

Rate Core i7-975 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1230 v3 or Core i7-975, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.