Xeon Gold 5218R vs E3-1230 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1230 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 69 Watt
3.90
Xeon Gold 5218R
2020
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
15.58
+299%

Xeon Gold 5218R outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v2 by a whopping 299% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 5218R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1439440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.5921.61
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency5.3511.80
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)24 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$360$1,273

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5218R has 1259% better value for money than Xeon E3-1230 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 5218R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads840
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1.25 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)20 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)27.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature66 °C87 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 5218R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 5218R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 5218R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 5218R are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 5218R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2667
Maximum memory size32.77 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 5218R.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1230 v2 3.90
Xeon Gold 5218R 15.58
+299%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1230 v2 6197
Xeon Gold 5218R 24742
+299%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.90 15.58
Recency 14 May 2012 24 February 2020
Physical cores 4 20
Threads 8 40
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E3-1230 v2 has 81.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5218R, on the other hand, has a 299.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 5218R is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1230 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 5218R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2
Xeon E3-1230 v2
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R
Xeon Gold 5218R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2713 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5218R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1230 v2 or Xeon Gold 5218R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.