Xeon E5-2609 vs E3-1226 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1226 v3
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 84 Watt
3.49
+93.9%
Xeon E5-2609
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.80

Xeon E3-1226 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15402018
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.310.86
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesXeon (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency3.912.12
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date11 May 2014 (10 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$213$143

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1226 v3 has 169% better value for money than Xeon E5-2609.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s6.4 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)10240 KB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2294 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+-
SIPP+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB384 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4600no data
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
Execution Units20no data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA2880x1800@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1226 v3 3.49
+93.9%
Xeon E5-2609 1.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1226 v3 5543
+93.9%
Xeon E5-2609 2858

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1226 v3 1156
+183%
Xeon E5-2609 409

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1226 v3 3308
+158%
Xeon E5-2609 1283

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.49 1.80
Recency 11 May 2014 6 March 2012
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon E3-1226 v3 has a 93.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2609, on the other hand, has 5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1226 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2609 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1226 v3 and Xeon E5-2609, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3
Xeon E3-1226 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2609
Xeon E5-2609

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 82 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1226 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 12 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2609 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1226 v3 or Xeon E5-2609, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.